I prefer to restrict the government to as few areas as possible. Primarily because the government is inefficient by design. Government spending means spending someone else's money (taxes) on somebody else (citizens). As Milton Friedman described here, this is the most wasteful way to spend money, regardless of the government's honest intent.
Also, there is one area where the government is indispensable: the application of force. I do not feel comfortable with the monopoly of violence residing in private hands.
Hence, using the above two constraints, the acceptable government tasks are those which need some form of physical coercion/force for the greater good. And the government having a monopoly on violence is ideally suited to perform those. Like the police, military, judiciary, enforcements of contracts, community discipline in case of a pandemic, etc.
I want to explain the activities of my ideal government with some examples:
| Task | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Impoverished seniors | Voluntary collective |
| Military spending | Government |
| Community health, pandemic | Government |
| Education for poor | Voluntary collective |
| Helthcare for poor | Voluntary collective |
| Homelessness | Voluntary collective |
| UBI | Voluntary collective |
| Bail out industry | Market. Industry should create its own rainy day buffer out of its profit/initial investment. If no longer feasible to run the industry, shut it down. |
| Regulatory Agencies. RBI, IRDA, CSRIL, RERA | Government. It is government's job to prevent chaos across industries such as Finance, Insurance Real estate. Thanks to Ashutosh for this point. |
| Non intrusive testing/tracing capabilities for pandemic management | Government. This is public-health-issue, as opposed to personal healthcare. But I cannot imagine any government building a tracking/tracing capability which it won't misuse by invading into citizen privacy. Honouring privacy requires ethics of the highest order, and no government can maintain high ethics. |
No comments:
Post a Comment